About the conference

COP - Logo 2

What is the COP?

Where is the LFJM COP taking place virtually?

What is the vision of the LFJM COP?

What are the three resolutions on which the LFJM COP will focus its attention?

Who is going to be taking part to the LFJM COP?


LFJM COP - resolution 3

Working towards the SDG 11

SDG 11

Proposed by Hannibal Anthon, Luka Citron, Galadriel Daufresne, Scarlet  Wilson Delaye 


The promotion of new strategies to work towards the accomplishment of the eleventh SDG: sustainable cities and communities.


Noting with deep concern that fossil and non-renewable energies are highly polluting and typically found in specific regions of the world, making it difficult to extract and access. For example, oil drilling could require stripping Canada’s boreal forest with specific technologies, the act itself leading to several dangerous natural disasters. However, mentioning that access to renewable energies, such as solar energy, wind energy, hydroelectric power, biomass energy, geothermal energy, tidal and and wave energy.

Stressing that climate change is not stopping and will only get worse

Recognizing that changing traditions and infrastructure is difficult and will take time

Keeping in mind the possibility of conflicts over fossil fuel resources regarding their dependency on such industries

Concerned about reports from the Center for Biological Diversity which state that globally 15 percent or more of man made carbon dioxide is derived from cars, trucks, airplanes, ships and other modes of transportation

Cognizant of the level of dependency placed on petroleum and furthermore acknowledging that approximately 96% of transportation fuel is in the form of petroleum

Referring to the fact that only with international unity can climate change can be reversed by developing green transportation and other countermeasures
- Urges member states to promote and research for vehicles not powered through fossil fuels
- Recommends member states use natural gas
- Recommends all countries to encourage popularization of transportation that run on more efficient or zero emissions
- Calls for member states to incentivise the use of green technologies for commercial and consumer purposes
- Encourages MEDCs to help LEDCs in financing the initial investment of switching to greener technologies
- Requests creation of minor biyearly goals created by member states to guide the accomplishment of long term goals


LFJM COP - resolution 2

Resolution 2 : Environmental migration

Refufies-clim

Proposed by Hannibal Anthon, Luka Citron, Galadriel Daufresne, Scarlet  Wilson Delaye 

Since 1990, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been forecasting that strong human migrations would be a major consequence of climate change and the rise of the level of sea waters. We understand today that these warnings were truthful as 25 million of people on earth are forced to move every year due to natural catastrophes mainly caused by climate change. The situation is critical in many different locations around the world for populations who slowly see the day where they will be forced to leave their houses come closer. This is the case for the inhabitants of Beijing who observe the Gobi desert grow by 10000km² per year becoming a bigger menace to their lives by day. Similarly, in the Arctic circle, the melting of the far north’s permafrost will drive local populations to leave their homelands.


Acknowledging that the rise in sea levels is mainly due to the melting of land ice, caused by the continuous increase in temperatures. This corroborates the urgency of dealing with global warming as part of this discussion.

Noting with concern that the world will have 150–200 million climate change refugees by 2050

Recognising that during the 2020 LFJM COP the countries, organisations and companies will have to work toward solving the major issue which has already been one for the last 10 years and will become growingly important in the future, the environmental migration.

Alarmed by, according to the fourth IPCC report, in 2004, the 49 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent emitted by the following human activities:
- energy sector is 25.9%;
- industry at 19.4%;
- the forestry sector at 17.4%;
- agriculture at 13.5%;
- transport at 13.1%;
- homes at 7.9%;
- waste and wastewater at 2.8%.


These different human activities are the main causes of the growth of CO2 emissions resulting in a higher temperature on earth and which therefore increases the melting of ice and as a consequence environmental migration.

The many actors of this COP will therefore have to work hard together to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by focusing on some of these activities, in particular those which have an important share in the greenhouse gas emissions, in particular by making compromises to resolve the growing problem of environmental migration.


Discussion points:
- Urges the construction of sea walls, storm water pumps and upgrading sewage systems to slow down the rise of sea levels.
- Calls for financial help to invest in solutions to slow land sinkage.
- Recognising that countries directly impacted by migration are the ones that contribute the least in gas emissions and should therefore receive important support from the more responsible countries.
- Calls for good emergency planning and adaptation policies which mitigate the wet and dry extremes of our changing climate that will reduce pressures on migration
- Advises the raising of awareness of the EU-funded project implemented by IOM on 'Mainstreaming Migration into International Cooperation and Development' (MMICD project) that developed a video that serves as both a training and outreach tool to showcase the #MigrationConnection


LFJM COP - resolution 1

Reduction of CO2 emissions through carbon neutrality

Proposed by Hannibal Anthon, Luka Citron, Galadriel Daufresne, Scarlet  Wilson Delaye 

2020 has proven to be a year full of changes and has redefined our way of living, thinking, and consuming. With the worldwide pandemic, carbon emissions exceptionally decreased, a staggering 8.8 % decrease was observed in CO2 emissions in the first half of 2020 compared to the same period in 2019. This massive decrease in our carbon footprint not only exposes the central role of human activity on CO2 emissions, but also highlights the potential and scale of the possible change our societies can inflict on emissions.


With carbon emissions being the main cause of global climate change, and the planet's average surface temperature rising about 2.05 degrees Fahrenheit (1.14 degrees Celsius) since the late 19th century, it is essential to try to find compromises in our daily CO2 emissions.

Carbon neutrality, with hundreds of countries already pledging to obtain this neutrality, aims to achieve net zero carbon dioxide emissions by balancing carbon dioxide emissions with removal or simply eliminating carbon dioxide emissions altogether. This carbon neutrality has a dual approach with the possibility of reduction as well as compensation, and could therefore be a
highly productive approach to discuss in this COP convention.


We are aware of the challenge of cutting CO2 emissions and the economic effects. For example, sub-Saharan Africa as a result of reducing their CO2 emissions, saw the number of people living in poverty double. However, data compiled by the World Resources Institute shows that since 2000, 21 developing countries have reduced annual emissions while simultaneously growing their economies, indicating that the decoupling of economic growth with emissions is possible. Furthermore, The Low Carbon Index found that several G20 countries have reduced their economies’ carbon intensity while maintaining GDP growth, including
countries classified as ‘developing’, such as China, India, South Africa and Mexico. These exciting statistics lay the possible tone of change in global carbon emissions, and hopefully insight a new dynamic amongst the debates in this year’s COP LFJM 2020!

Discussion points:
- Promote alternative travel to air travel which is one of the main CO2 emitters, with for example trains, who are only responsible for 4% of global emissions of CO2 in transport in 2019.
- Increase in global production of renewable energy, renewable energy only accounting for 26.2% of global electricity generation in 2018 and the demand for electricity predicted to more than double by 2040 according to Renewable Energy Policy Network’s overview. Benefits of increasing global renewable energy consumption include creating more job opportunities in the energy sector and achieving energy independence
- Optimise the implantation of solar panels, Africa has the richest solar resources in the world but only exploits 1% of its solar capacity.
- Create renewable energy strategies shaped to each country’s unique circumstances to maintain and encourage growth while reducing emissions
- Implementation of policies in developing countries to shit away from an economy relying on carbon intensive industries.
- Coordination of policies at a global level to ensure a worldwide shift towards a decrease in carbon emissions.
- Assure the measurement of the carbon footprint of industries, for example In the United States where the industry sector accounts for approximately 22 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in 2019.
- Impose policies on industry's carbon emissions
- Rewarding environmental friendly commuting of company workers, cars being the number one carbon emissioner.
- Put into place standards and policies on industry’s carbon emissions
- Noting with deep concern that over the past 70 years, global CO2 emissions have increased by a factor of almost seven
- Encourage the United Nations Industrial Development Organization and UN funding bodies to provide support and incentives in order to minimize economic damages caused by reduction of fossil fuel use:
- Alarmed by the 4.6 million deaths every year due to PM2.5 , PM10 and CO2 emissions


The LFJM COP vision

By Hannibal Anthon, Luka Citron, Galadriel Daufresne, Scarlet  Wilson Delaye 

Climate change, brought on by human intervention, specifically during the Anthropocene period, is a phenomenon with which our society is engaged in an ongoing battle. The impacts brought on by climate change are many, are dangerous and threaten not only our environment, for example our oceans, but, ironically, humanity as well, and our well being.

This Cop, located virtually in Copenhagen, a city willing to go to great lengths to protect the environment, has several goals in mind to discuss and hopefully agree on. They include the question of CO2 emission reduction, settling the debate about immigration due to climate change, and the promotion of the use of renewable resources as a replacement for our primary, polluting ones.

We would like to thank all the countries in attendance, China, Brazil, USA, the European Union and the oil producing nations. We also welcome the presence and participation of several Intergovernemental organizations and Non-Governmental organizations, the United Nations, the Alliance of small pacific islands, Oxfam, WWF, Greenpeace and the indigenous people.

This intergovernmental debate also recognizes civil society as a crucial actor and give them full right to vote. 




The LFJM delegates

Photo 3

The EU: Kenny Abgoton - Luke Mellish

The United-States: Félix Marchal - Maximilien Robin

China: Thomas Herbaut - Tianyi Xu

Brésil: Alice Bigot - Alexandra Strutsiuk

AOSIS: Gabriella Cantone - Cholé Dupontreue

Peuples autochtone : Pauline Dekoninck - Emmy Barthe

Pays pétroliers: Galadriel Daufresne de la Chevalerie - Scarlet Wilson Delaye

ONU: Emily Lewis - Clara Sicard - Théophile Vernet

ONG environnementales: Paul Aubin - Aymeric De Broca

ONG sociales: Pierre-Louis Moreau - Luca Parot - Mathias Willarroel

FMN: Hannibal Anton - Luka Citron

 


What is the COP?

Cop21_1

CMSCOP13_digital_backdrop_1140

Article d'Alice Bigot, Emily Lewis, Clara Sicard, Alexandra Strutsiuk, Théophile Vernet

An internationalization of the environmental question has proved itself vital to address the growing concerns regarding the state of the climate. At first only addressed as a scientific issue, alarming reports and studies like Rachel Carson’s Our Silent Spring in 1963 or the report of the club of Rome Limits to Growth in 1971 triggered a questioning and a wave of awareness to the danger that overexploitation of resources presented on the long term both for ecosystems and societies. This caused the environmental preoccupations to be brought in the light of politics, sciences getting involved in the political process as national governments decided that it was in their interest to use the newly reported information to act upon the upcoming threats to the well-being of the state. George H. and W. Bush’s and Bill Clinton’s protective policies towards American resources, as well as the growing attention to environmental concerns in French politics have motivated a global spread of mobilization for the state of the environment. This new vision of the world’s well-being as a common responsibility led to an explosion of international institutions focused around an expert scientific approach to understand and solve the issues. Since 1970, Earth summits allow nations to compare and discuss environmental policies. Moreover, to guarantee a precise scientific study that brings real awareness to the state of the climate and a development of concise solutions, scientific committees are created: the International Meteorological Organization (1973) and  the Intergovernmental Group of Experts on the Climate (1988), where experts track the state of the climate to actively guide the international instances in charge of environmental policy collaboration like the United Nations Program for the Environment since 1988.

This growing need for an institutional, formal and multilateral approach to the environmental issue led to the creation of the COP (Conference of the Parties) by the UNCED in 1992. During this annual summit, IGEC reports are used to encourage discussions, negotiations and ratified accords between nations and NGOs regarding the state of the climate in sub-commissions of the UN organ. The COPs are organized each year to encourage a collective change, striving to be as inclusive as possible, taking into account as many factors as possible, like the country’s demography, economic state, urbanization, agrarian policy, technology advancement, renewable energy development, adaptation to climate change and position regarding the question of environmental protection.

During the annual COPs, the parties attempt to take key measures to tackle climate change and environmental deterioration due to human activities. For instance, during the first COP ever held, in Berlin in 1995, the first discussions to reduce CO2 emissions led the way to future measures, motivated by an iron will to slow down the effects of climate change on the world. During the 1997 Tokyo COP, ratified by 184 countries, there was a first agreement with clear numbers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, setting the tone for a formal and controlled international policy against pollution and human impact on their environment. Another key COP worth mentioning would be the COP 13 in Bali in 2007, during which developing countries clearly shifted positions in their environmental policy, ready to make efforts to reduce industrial pollution and adapt their national policy since they are important victims to climate change. The Paris COP21 in 2015 is also evidence of the determination of the participating nations, even ready to limit global warming by 2°C compared to the pre industrial era, an overly ambitious project that still shows how important the question is to the international community.

One of the successes of the COP is the context of global cooperation it creates: the COP 21 was signed by 195 countries while COP 22 was joined by 53 African nations. Such a cooperation incites technological progress in developing countries, gaining knowledge and financial support from the inclusive process. In the same way, the COP location is just as diverse as the process, allowing interaction with different environments. This allows further mobilization and cooperation between nations, like showed by China and France, working together in 2018 to send a satellite to observe climate change. The agreements motivate countries to work on energy efficiency, thus reducing energy waste and pollution on the long term, like in Brazil, where now 80% of cars function on a mix between gas and ethanol. On the grand scale of things, the internalization of the environmental issues and the iron will of the COP also paved the road for civic movements, demanding “climate justice” and feeling included in the fight for the climate.

Nevertheless, the COP still has a limited power when it comes to stopping climate change. A global policy is hard to harmonize with very specific environments and policies already present in the countries. For instance, nations can refuse to vote in favor of any restrictive measures, believing that they go against their need for economic development and overall national demographic structure. There being no way to coerce the nations into applying the proposed measures and no clear way for punishing environmental damage, efforts to tackle the issues are unequal and thus the fight against climate change is slower. For example, USA’s refusal to ratify the Paris accords as one of the biggest greenhouse gas emissions directly prevents the measures from being truly efficient. This global inefficiency of applied COP measures is alarming: not even 10% of the signing countries go through with the promised policies and all the indicators are still in the red. Moreover, today’s tendency to decide unilaterally, thinking of national interests first slow down negotiations, with the growing divisions within the EU as well as the tensions created by American and Brazilian national policies when opposed to the demands of the COP.  


Our COP is taking place in ...

Lundi 30 novembre 2020, le groupe de travail a fait 5 propositions de localisation virtuelle de notre COP :

  • Saint-Pétersbourg : une ville ouverte sur l'Europe – passerelle entre l'Europe et la Russie – de nombreux efforts ont été réalisés ces dernières années pour "verdiser" l'agglomération et préserver la biodiversité - dans le même temps, une agglomération dans un pays grand producteur d'énergies fossiles
  • Bruxelles : capitale de l'UE - grande pratique dans l'accueil de conférences internationales –  un aéroport international avec Zaventem – arrivée des verts au pouvoir – encourager le basculement dans une politique plus écologique
  • Tokyo : fort investissement dans la technologie verte – forte desserte en transport en commun– tout en ayant une forte consommation de plastique
  • Stockholm : ville les plus propre d’Europe – 2010, prix Green Capital Award
  • Copenhague : ville verte - ville engagée dans de nombreuses réformes écologiques - grand usage du vélo - ville bien engagée dans une logique de protection de l'environnement

A la majorité, l'assemblée a décidé d'accepter la candidature de la ville de Copenhague.

5-copenhague-petitesirene-2-768x432